savingthrows: ([-] frown)
Eleven ([personal profile] savingthrows) wrote2019-07-31 01:14 am
Entry tags:

IC Inbox for [personal profile] inthenightmods


INBOX
@ eleven
text / audio / video / action

... Hello?
code credit
webshoots: (( suit ) s... mile)

1/2 i'm sorry

[personal profile] webshoots 2019-10-22 08:47 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, that might be true, but I'm going to have to hear some examples before I start accepting such slander against my good name, missy.

[ mockingly stern: it's very obvious he's not actually offended. ]

It's scientific theory: you start with an observation, in this case — Peter Parker is silly, then you ask a question (how is Peter Parker silly?), then you form a hypothesis which — I could give an example, but I feel like I'd be supporting my own character assassination, but for an unrelated example, maybe your hypothesis is Peter Parker holds very strong opinions about what counts as a schmear of cream cheese on a bagel.

Then you come up with a prediction - a testable theory, which in this case might be: if I give Peter a bagel which has more or less than a schmear, he's going to be mildly offended; if I give him a bagel which has an exact schmear, he's going to be happy and say nothing. Testing this would be providing Peter Parker with a variety of bagels with different amounts of cream cheese, some of which definitely do count as schmears, and some of which are definitely not and subsequently offensive to the name of bagels everywhere.

If Peter says nothing about any of the bagels, your hypothesis is unsupported and incorrect. If Peter does complain about the non-schmeared bagels, your hypothesis is supported and therefore likely correct.
webshoots: (( face ) spider-men was pretty good)

[personal profile] webshoots 2019-10-22 08:50 am (UTC)(link)
Then you iterate, which is when you reflect on your results and use them to inform your next steps. It tends to lead to more theories and scientific investigations.

But I'm going to admit that right now, I feel a bit weird about talking about myself in third-person so much and also admit that schmear has stopped sounding like a word.
webshoots: (( face ) ugh i still hate this arc)

[personal profile] webshoots 2019-10-22 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I— [ it clicks. the lingering questions he'd had after their first meeting have been answered by her second question, and he winces (way to go, parker). whilst the expression itself isn't visible, it's there in the pause, in the silence before he answers. ]

Friends don't lie, right? [ he repeats, any levity all but gone; an audible inhale, then: ] Yeah. It was my passion at school, and I studied biochemistry at college. The plan was to go into STEM, but things didn't quite work out like that — for a long time, the closest I got was teaching at my old high school. I had a company for a while, but we were more tech focused — on making things to help people.

[ a beat. ] I can't say we — I — don't do experiments, but they're not what you think. I know you've only got my word, but I would never do anything that would hurt anyone. [ he can't say there isn't a human element, because of anything, human trials are always one of the last steps where relevant; he's not even sure if saying 'but consent is always required' would even make it better. ] Anyone that does is a bad scientist, okay?

I'm sorry, El.
webshoots: (Default)

[personal profile] webshoots 2019-10-22 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
[ peter waits for a bit before realising that a response isn't coming. he doesn't want to make any assumptions about her response or how she's feeling, other than whoops, maybe that was the wrong response? it's a little while later then that he sends a message, switching back to text: ]

Hey, El. If you want to talk at some point, I'll be around. If not, I get it.

Just take care of yourself, okay?

- Peter